Back to DC public schools main pageGardinar Kamya report on student records

DCPS to Implement Recommendations from Review of Senior High School Student Records Reports
December 9, 2003

DCPSWatch Home

Major Areas
DC Public Schools
Mayoral Takeover
Special Education

State Education Agency
State Education Office
Vouchers
WTU
Wilson S.H.S.

Calendars
Board of Education
School Year

Columns
Elizabeth Davis
Ron Drake
Erich Martel
Nathan Saunders

Directories
Schools

Letters

Links

Organizations
DC Education Compact
Parents United
Proposition 100%

Press

Search

DCWatch Home

District of Columbia Public Schools
News Release

Dr. Paul L. Vance, Superintendent 
Office of Communications and Public Information
825 North Capitol Street. NE • 7th Floor • Washington. DC 20002 • Tel: (202) 442-5635 • Fax: (202) 442-5418 • www.k12.dc.us

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 
Tuesday, December 9, 2003
CONTACT: Linda Wharton Boyd, 202-442-5635 
Eves/Weekends (202) 727- 6161

DC PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO IMPLEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FROM REVIEW OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT RECORDS REPORTS
“Outside Consultants and Internal Management Review Taskforce Produce Reports After Concluding Study of District’s Management of Student Records”

Washington, DC – District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) officials received preliminary reports on the findings of the recent study of the school system’s student records management and reporting policies. School officials plan to address the findings and have indicated their intention to expeditiously implement the recommendations.

DCPS has already begun implementing recommendations which include:

  • Principal Orientation and Training;
  • Review of School System policies and directives for granting Carnegie Credits
  • Review of Superintendent directives and Board Policy and the development of a Records Procedures Manual;
  • System-wide training for Records Maintenance staff
  • Initiation of a web-based electronic student data base.

The Superintendent of Schools initiated two internal reviews and one external review after allegations about grade mismanagement surfaced in May 2002 when a social studies teacher complained about improper grade changes and other inaccuracies in student records at his school.

Following the allegations, former Superintendent Dr. Paul L. Vance assembled an investigation team to examine each allegation and appointed an external independent consultant to review the reported allegations and the findings of the team.

The independent consultant, Gardiner, Kamya & Associates, P.C. (GKA), performed certain agreed-upon procedures to determine:

Whether the student records at 16 DCPS senior high schools were complete, accurate, secure and confidentially maintained;

Whether the 15 students identified by school officials who graduated from Wilson Senior High School Class of 2002 met the DCPS graduation requirements prior to graduation; and

Whether the grades reported by the DCPS Office of Information Technology (OIT) were consistent with the grades maintained in the student records at each school.

The consultants reviewed the written policies and procedures of each school, interviewed school staff, including principals, assistant principals and employees who maintained student records. They also randomly selected 59 students from grades 10 through 12 to get a snapshot of records and grading procedures. The team conducted tests to determine the completeness, consistency, accuracy and reliability of these students’ records. The investigation team assessed the security of records and the controls implemented to prevent tampering and scrutinized the records of the 15 Wilson Senior High School students to determine whether they met established graduation criteria.

The Gardiner, Kamya & Associates team found that there was no overall consistency in policies and procedures resulting in different policies and procedures governing each school with respect to student grades and maintenance of student records.

In addition, the team discovered among other things, that:

  • Most schools’ policies and procedures did not address the issue of physical and electronic access to student records;
  • The grading and grade verification process was not addressed by some schools’ policies and procedures;
  • Criteria for grading differed among schools. For example, some schools had a grade system of A through F with plusses or minuses, while others included +/-.
  • Internal controls were not operating effectively at any of the 16 high schools/sites resulting in unauthorized access to student records;
  • Student records were incomplete in all 16 schools;
  • Student records made available to the team were inconsistent, inaccurate and unreliable at all 16 high schools/sites;
  • Some schools did not address independent studies of their policies and procedures, while those who did were not clear on how independent studies should be handled.

The team found that there were problems in OIT with regards to tracking student grades, student records were disorganized, and conditions existed where tampering with student grades may have occurred undetected.

The DCPS team and GKA found that while there were serious concerns about student records management and evidence of discrepancies, there is no evidence of deliberate tampering.

Back to top of page


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcpswatch.com
Web site copyright ©1997-2003, DCWatch