Back to DC public schools main page — Back to Mayor’s Office main page
|
Major Areas State Education
Agency Calendars Columns Directories Organizations |
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR PUBLIC ROUNDTABLE: Statement of Committee on Education, Libraries and Recreation Monday, March 29, 2004 Good evening Chairman Chavous, members of the Committee and other councilmembers. I come before you today to testify in support of my proposal to reform the governance structure of the DC Public Schools. I will not spend much time explaining the details of the bill I have submitted, but rather I wish to discuss the merits of this approach and address some of the questions and concerns I have heard over the last few months, as I have met in each ward with parents, students, teachers and principals. I have explored the issue of school governance since the beginning of my first term. My discussions with mayors, former and newly seated superintendents and others have confirmed that governance reform is part of a complex reform agenda. There is not only the politics of getting legislation passed, but there is also the challenge of implementation - change is hard. So why pursue the issue? Does governance matter enough? By itself governance reform is not the answer. It is a means to an end. Governance arrangements establish the rules of the game. They determine who is responsible and accountable for what within a system. We all know that in the education system, the real work of learning takes place in the classroom - in the interaction between teacher and student. However, decisions by school leaders, superintendents, and policymakers can either help or hinder what goes on in the classroom. Without good governance, good schools are the exception, not the rule. Without a governance system that demands the best from all involved, the burden on principals and teachers to create positive learning environments is even more difficult. There are documented benefits to enhanced mayoral accountability of public school systems. We see examples of progress in Chicago and Boston where mayors have taken on this challenge. The New York City reform is still too new to make any definitive assessment of outcomes, but early signs show progress there as well. But I do not come to my position on the need for this type of reform here in DC because it has worked for Chicago, Boston or other cities and counties. I strongly believe that there are benefits to centralized accountability and a strong cabinet-level Chancellor of Schools for this city at this time. Our ultimate focus should be on improving the quality of education in the District such that we are no longer among the last in the nation. Our children deserve the type of education befitting a city with the resources and potential that we see in other ways of life here. We must work together to ensure that students enter school ready to learn, perform at or above grade level in all subjects, and meet or exceed the national averages on standardized examinations. We must attract and retain highly qualified teachers, who demonstrate subject matter proficiency and high performance on professional exams. Likewise, principals must be highly skilled in instructional leadership and building management, and emphasize student achievement and accountability. Finally, parents must have a variety of quality educational settings (including traditional, charter, and non-public schools) that cater to the variety of students in our system. Clearly, the status quo has not fulfilled this goal. While we should allow for autonomy and flexibility, no school should be without the basics tools necessary for achieving academic excellence. Whether schools are East of the River or West of the Park, they should have the requisite number of teachers in core subject areas (reading, math, science, etc.) They should also have libraries, access to technology and exposure to music and arts. Principals and parents should not have to go through the annual exercise of deciding whether to keep a librarian or an art teacher, or whether they can afford to lose a reading specialist. There are many ways to get us to this point. I believe that the governance proposal I have submitted will fundamentally change, for the better, the way we do business. What would be different under my proposal? If you approve my bill, I will be accountable for a number of short-term accomplishments. It is unbelievable that we have to actually strive to achieve some of these things, but such is the state of our public school system. Here is a sampling of what I know we can accomplish with a governance structure that has everybody rowing together:
I firmly believe members of the Board, the Council, and the Superintendent all want the best for our children. The problem is not a lack of motivation, the problem is a system that by its very nature causes us to spend too much time calibrating between branches of government and being worried about bureaucratic nuances and turf issues. Mr. Chair, we all have spent many years talking to, and sometimes at each other, but sadly that dialogue has been about disagreement over what is fact, instead of building a common vision. It is ironic that we would consider maintaining this current structure when over the years the Council has witnessed the challenges of getting the school system to follow though on numerous initiatives that have been in best interest of our students We have complained about capital projects that never get executed, or resorted to drafting legislation to demand the timely adoption of textbooks, transparent financial reporting, or co-location of charter schools in underutilized DCPS buildings. Indeed we have has some success in collaborating with the schools system. Most notably the transformation schools and wrap around services initiatives are good examples of what cross agency collaboration can bring about. In addition we have had some recent success in folding DCPS into the District's ASMP system. But think about how much time and resources we would have saved over the last three years if we did not have an independent school system building its own fiber optic network, and trying to create its own personnel, procurement and payroll systems. We must rationalize our current approach to education service delivery, give a Chancellor instructional and operational control of the schools, and centralize accountability such that those who provide the resources (the Mayor and Council) accountable for how those dollars are spent. I am willing to be held accountable and I am committed to providing the Chancellor the support needed to do his/her job. When I first became Mayor I promised that we would make government work. Today through collaboration with the Council, our citizens are better served today then they were six years ago. We answer the phones, pick up the trash, and clean the streets. We must take this same no nonsense approach to fixing our education system. The issue of governance over the schools must be addressed once and for all. The Education Collaborative that we recently announced is an only interim measure that will address the immediate and critical need to locate a person of exceptional skill to be our next superintendent. While I am committed to working with the collaborative in the short term, we must also definitively settle which governance model best supports long-term improvement of the DC public school system. I offer you my proposal as a viable solution. My proposal provides the most hope for our city to have a public education system second to none. This approach would create a system that would truly ensure that our children are. Quite frankly they cannot afford to wait one minute more while we figure this thing out. |
![]()
Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcpswatch.com
Web site copyright ©1997-2003, DCWatch