|
DCPSWatch Home
Major Areas
DC Public Schools
Mayoral
Takeover
Special Education
State Education
Agency
State Education Office
Vouchers
WTU
Wilson S.H.S.
Calendars
Board of Education
School Year
Columns
Elizabeth Davis
Ron Drake
Erich Martel
Nathan Saunders
Directories
Schools
Letters
Links
Organizations
DC Education
Compact
Parents United
Proposition 100%
Press
Search
DCWatch
Home
|
[The following editor's note was added to the academic plan on May 9,
2007, after it was revealed that about a third of this plan was copied
from an academic plan for the Charlotte-Mecklenberg, North Carolina,
public schools.]
Editor's Note
This document is a compendium of earlier reform
initiatives, plans and best practices developed for the District of
Columbia Public Schools and other jurisdictions. It includes language
from: the DCPS Master Education Plan, 2006 Parthenon Report, 2000 McKinsey
Report, 1986 COPE Report and numerous reports prepared by the Council of
Great City Schools, as well as documents prepared by, for or about the
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Schools, Chicago Public Schools, Denver
Public Schools, Houston Independent School District, Los Angeles Unified
School District, Miami-Dade Public Schools, New York City Department of
Education and the Oakland Unified School District. As we seek to raise the
performance of all our students, we will work with speed and resolve to
intervene aggressively on behalf of our lowest performing schools and
students, and will not be satisfied only by an increase in performance
among our lowest performing. The Administration will seek to increase the
rigor, options and performance of our highest performing students.
The Vision
In 2006, the United States produced six Nobel Prize winners. All of them were educated in public schools. This is the standard
of education that DCPS must strive to deliver. The Fenty administration expects DCPS to produce students who can compete
locally, nationally and internationally.
This endeavor towards excellence will demand an intense focus on student success above all else, a strategic prioritization of
resources, and relentless attention to implementation. More than anything, it will require unwavering commitment and hard
work on the part of thousands of adults within the school district and across numerous city agencies, as well as parents and
community members.
To secure the District of Columbia’s place as an indisputably world-class city, we must have a world-class education system.
We recognize that where we stand today the goal of making DCPS the public school system of choice seems audacious, but as a
community we must aspire to more than that, because we deserve better and because, as globalization continues to flatten the
world, success for the next generation will require it. And so, our reference point must move beyond our own historical
performance or that of other urban jurisdictions; in fact, it must move beyond the United States itself. We must seek to
transform DCPS into the premier urban public education system among world capitals. It is an ambitious goal, and one this
administration will pursue tirelessly.
Measures of Success
While standardized testing can only tell part of the student achievement story, it is the easiest method of tracking and comparing
student performance at the most basic levels. At the local level, we will continue to track the progress of our students using the
District of Columbia Comprehensive Assessment System (DC-CAS). At the national level, the National Assessment for
Educational Progress (NAEP) will be our yardstick, and at the international level, the District of Columbia will investigate
the possibility of tracking its performance on the Trends in International Math and Science Study (TIMSS) and Progress in
International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), the two most widely used international measures of student performance.
Our starting point is sobering. We have all seen the data, perhaps so much that it ceases to enrage us in the way it should. On
average, our students are performing poorly by any measure. Moreover, the data reveal a stunning achievement gap
between white students and students of color.
We will seek to raise the performance of all our students. We will work with speed and resolve to intervene aggressively on
behalf of our lowest performing schools and students, but we will not be satisfied only by an increase in performance among our
lowest performing. We will also seek to increase the rigor, options, and performance of our highest performing students.
The Task at Hand
Many of our students are challenged by circumstances outside of the schools’ control, such as poverty and learning English as a
second language. But there can be no excuses. We must prepare all of our students to reach beyond today’s scores, today’s tests
and today’s challenges. There is significant research indicating that schools in general, and teachers in particular, can have an
enormous impact on student achievement, despite whatever outside challenges a child brings to school. So even as we seek to
ease the burden on schools by addressing the social issues that impact our students’ ability to excel, we must move forward
aggressively with the knowledge that schools can drive high levels of achievement despite these obstacles.
We have taken the first bold step of asking that the artificial boundaries that exist between DCPS as a school system and
the network of agencies controlled by the Executive Office of the Mayor be eliminated. But that change is only the first step.
Getting DCPS to succeed will require an across the board mindset shift. We must earn the trust of educators, support staff,
parents, students, and the community at large through demonstrating that this is not business as usual. In return, we will demand
the investment and hard work of all of these stakeholders. Across city government, we will demand that agencies define their
roles and measure their outcomes from a new vantage point. The failure of ANY child will be OUR collective responsibility.
The Plan
Under the leadership of the current Superintendent, DCPS has articulated a new Mission, a set of Core Beliefs and
Commitments, a Master Education Plan and a Master Facilities Plan. The Fenty administration recognizes these reform
principles and documents as the product of significant community involvement and is committed to them as the starting point for
its reform efforts following the passage of the “District of Columbia Public Education Reform Amendment Act of 2007”.
We have identified a set of high priority goals and strategies that fit within the framework of the Master Education Plan. Some
of these are strategies that have been adopted already by DCPS, but not implemented fully. Others are strategies that were not
discussed explicitly in the MEP, but support the implementation of MEP objectives.
The strategies outlined in this Plan are not all-inclusive. Rather, they represent the major initiatives that will be in place by 2010to meet the goals listed. Achieving the new goals will take time, but some dramatic action and changes must — and will —
occur immediately. More actions and changes will follow, as additional plans and strategies are developed and/or refined.
This Plan is being provided to give context around the “District of Columbia Public Education Reform Amendment Act of
2007.” The recommendations within this Plan were made with limited access to data, personnel, etc. There will be continuous
dialogue between the Mayor and the Superintendent once a preliminary analysis of the school system is completed after the
legislation passes.
All of this work will require dedication and the sustained commitment of many partners, including educators, parents, students,
taxpayers, and civic and community members. To succeed, we must enhance what has worked well before – projects and
programs with proven, measurable results – and let go of projects and programs that do not increase student achievement in
measurable ways. With limited financial resources, we must focus our investments on programs proven to work.
Fundamental Ingredients to Success
While success will ultimately depend on the prioritizing and effective execution of dozens of smart strategies, there are some
overarching approaches that will ground all that we do.
Human Capital
As in almost any enterprise, the best-designed plan is only as good as the people who carry it out, assess their progress, and are
willing and able to change course to improve outcomes. Effective teachers in every classroom and effective principals in every
school are critical to our academic success. School-based support staff and central administrators alike must have the skill and
will to attain challenging goals. Attaining our goals, therefore, relies heavily on recruiting effective personnel at every level, and
building their capacity through meaningful professional development. Without this talent mindset, we will flounder.
World-Class Service
In order to effectively make this Plan a reality, DCPS must transform its organizational culture to one that is truly
service-oriented. This will require a new way of thinking throughout the entire organization, top to bottom. In short, DCPS must be
responsive to its stakeholders, which include students, parents, community members and employees.
This transformation will only occur if the mindset of every person working for DCPS becomes truly service-oriented. As that
transformation occurs, DCPS must foster it with better resources, processes and training.
Freedom and Flexibility with Accountability
The school system's core business—teaching and learning—must be managed by the central office with some flexibility. This
flexibility must balance accountability with empowerment according to the needs and performance of individual schools or
particular classrooms. The structure of central office support itself must also be decentralized in order to be more responsive to
the needs of principals, their schools and the public.
Data Driven Decision Making
School systems rely on data to accurately assess student learning and make informed decisions to continually promote student
achievement. To ensure that school data is properly utilized in DCPS, the Chancellor will institute an accountability system
referred to as SchoolStat. A detailed description of SchoolStat is included in the Appendix.
First One Hundred Days and Beyond
Our approach during the first 100 days will be two-tracked. We will immediately begin a targeted assessment of the current
situation, focusing on areas we know to be of major concern. This initial assessment will include a budget scrub to get a clear
picture of where funds are currently allocated and available. It will also pay particular attention to the human resources
department, given that department’s critical role in fueling every other initiative. While a comprehensive assessment of the
status quo will take some time, we will not wait until it is complete to get to work on a number of key priorities.
In the section that follows, we have outlined the top level priorities we will act on during the first 100 days, along with a number
of other goals that will be addressed in the first 12-24 months.
Note: Special education and facilities are addressed specifically in a separate document.
Goal I: Ensure Challenging Curriculum and Instruction
for All Students
Strategy 1: Refine the K-8 comprehensive reading model
(Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Assess all K-3 students at the beginning and end
of each school year. Use these data to inform short-term reading
intervention strategy.
Students identified as struggling will receive
developmentally appropriate intensive reading support, including
additional time focused on language experience, phonemic
awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.
Students will stay in this intensive curriculum until they are
reading at grade level. |
Standardized reading assessment protocol will be
developed by the end of the 2007-2008 academic year, so teachers
can be trained.
Intensive reading curriculum & associated
intervention strategies will be developed and released within 180
days of the enactment of mayoral control. |
Reading assessments conducted and analyzed at the
beginning of each school year for all K-3 students. Key tracking
measure for principals; (see SchoolStat). Should drive allocation
of resources.
End of year reading assessments will be conducted
for all K-3 students. Data analysis will include measurement of
percentage of students who have changed status from struggling to
proficient, or the reverse. |
| To boost reading performance in grades
six through eight, students reading below grade level will be
enrolled in reading class taught by trained reading specialist,
until grade-level proficiency is achieved (in addition to their
standard language arts class). |
Pilot additional reading class in 2
middle schools for second semester of 2007-8 academic year
(potentially as part of Expanded Learning Time pilot – see
below) |
Analysis of intervention, including
comparing gains among the treatment group of students with a
control group at another middle school. |
Strategy 2: Refine the K-8 comprehensive mathematics
model (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
In grades six through eight, students below grade
level in math will take an intensive math course that supports the
regular math curriculum.
Math coaches will train teachers upfront and
support them on an ongoing basis through model lessons and
classroom observations. |
Pilot double math class in 2 middle schools for
2007-2008 academic year, based on Kamras model developed at Sousa.
Option for Expanded Learning Time school.
Analysis of intervention, including comparing
gains among the treatment group of students with a control group
at another middle school. |
Potential replication across system. |
Strategy 3: Accelerate intensive intervention strategies lowest performing high schools (Expands initiative articulated in Master
Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Identify high schools that qualify for reconstitution and begin development of
intervention strategies. |
Planning to begin immediately. Implementation of intervention strategies
beginning in 2008-2009 academic year. Activity will be ongoing. |
Comprehensive design and implementation plans, reflecting fundamental change in
approach at these schools. Increased Graduation rates. |
Strategy 4: Begin reform initiatives targeted at middle schools. (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Target middle schools for Teacher Advancement Program. |
Within 60 days, identify one school to begin model in
Fall 2008. |
Private investment secured within 90 days. |
| Explore creation of Eight-PLUS program,
which would provide mandatory intensive remedial instruction for students who do not
pass eighth grade. |
Analysis of research on 8+ interventions in
other jurisdictions complete in first 100 days. |
Recommendations re whether to implement
program and if so a timeline for next steps. Alignment with strategy to increase graduation
rates at the high school level. |
| Intensive “double math” – see above. |
|
|
| Expand after-school programs at middle schools. Programs will have three
components: tutoring, homework assistance and physical activity. The programs may
eventually include all students. Special areas such as art, music and journalism will be added
where feasible. |
Assess current offerings by end of first 6
months. |
Increased student engagement (including
attendance) and achievement. |
Strategy 5: Expand access to more rigorous courses at
the high school level. (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education
Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Expand purview of executive director for advanced
studies to enable that person to coordinate a comprehensive
approach to all advanced learning programs across all high
schools, including but not limited to:
-
Add or expand college-prep programs such as
Springboard, AVID, or other AP Incentives Programs.
-
Partner with a DC-based University to start a
Middle College program that will serve ~100 high school
juniors and seniors and provide a nontraditional high school
experience with exposure to college courses and increased
opportunities for acceleration.
-
Provide the option of 2 year AP courses, where
students commit to “looping” with teacher, providing them
extra time to close the preparation gap.
-
DCPS will partner with colleges and
universities in order to develop and create early college
initiatives. Through these initiatives students will be able
to earn associate degrees or two years of transferable college
credit while still in high school.
|
Redefine and staff position within first 100 days. |
Comprehensive strategic plan within 60 days of
staffing this newly defined role. Increased graduation rates. |
Strategy 6: Pilot extended learning programs through a competitive grant program (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education
Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Explore extended learning pilot as possible vehicle for:
-
Increased preparation opportunity for AP courses.
-
Additional time for science
-
Double math or intensive reading course in middle school
-
Music & fine arts, using external partners as providers
-
Foreign language programs
-
Regular sustained professional development for teachers
|
Develop RFP within 90 days. Planning grants awarded by December, 2007 |
Up to five schools implemented in 08-09 |
Strategy 7: Communicate student performance data to parents and students regularly and in a consistent manner.
(New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Redesign student report card. Develop a district-wide and standards based report card
that provides meaningful information on student progress towards state standards; report
card would be applicable to grades K-8. |
-
Establish a Report Card Committee within 60 days.
-
Develop and publish the new report card by 90 days after creation of Report Card
Committee.
-
Conduct report card training sessions for teachers within 60 days of publication of
new report card template.
|
Begin report card implementation in conjunction with the 2008-2009 school year. |
| Redesign DC-CAS parent report. Create a
standard template with supporting information (including information on SES alternatives,
etc.) for reporting individual DC-CAS results. Parents will be empowered to make informed
decisions about their child’s school. |
|
Include question on parent satisfaction survey.
Reports will be widely publicized and distributed using a variety of communication
channels, including meetings, Channel 99, the DCPS website, print materials, email, Connect-Ed and other tools. |
Goal I: Ensure Challenging Curriculum and Instruction for
All Students
Strategy 8: Expand Career and Technical Education (Expands
initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Break ground on Phelps |
2007-2008 school year |
Construction on schedule. |
| Replicate Cardozo building trades
program in two additional high schools |
Begin working with community partners
immediately |
One additional program operational by
2007 school year; a second by 2008. |
| Partner with labor unions to strengthen
programming and tie to key initiatives in apprenticeship programs
across District |
Pull together working group of these
partners within 90 days |
Comprehensive menu of potential
partnerships, timeline for implementation |
| Partner with WMATA and other major
skilled employers to develop certified HS training programs |
Implementation timelines established by
Spring 2007 |
Comprehensive menu of potential
partnerships, timeline for implementation |
Strategy 9: Expand foreign-language instruction at all
grade levels (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Expand the availability of bilingual-immersion
programs across the city, particularly in Wards east of the river. |
Identify potential school sites during SY07-08 and
begin implementation in SY08-09. |
Increased rigor and attractive programs of choice
for parents, and increased equity in access to programs across the
city. |
| DCPS will expand partnerships with area
embassies and cultural institutions to increase the foreign
language program offerings at all grade levels. |
Identify partners during 07-08 school
year; begin instituting programs in Spring 2008. |
Significantly expanded offerings. |
| Because the research findings of
neurologists and developmental psychologists show the earlier a
student is taught a second language, the easier it is to learn,
DCPS will explore the expansion of foreign language programs to
serve elementary and middle school students.Because the research
findings of neurologists and developmental psychologists show the
earlier a student is taught a second language, the easier it is to
learn, DCPS will explore the expansion of foreign language
programs to serve elementary and middle school students. |
A phase-in process will start in the
2009-2010 school year. |
|
Strategy 10: Expand opportunities for talented and gifted students (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Research creative programming in public charter schools and in other jurisdictions for
potential replication within DCPS. |
Consult with NAGC within first 6 months. |
Better identification of GT students. Increased quantity and quality of services. |
Strategy 11: Address the needs of English Language Learners (ELLs) (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Principal training regarding meeting the needs of ELLs |
Ongoing, through principals’ leadership institute. |
Better identification of GT students. Increased quantity and quality of services. |
| Expand Parents as Partners program Assess capacity within first 6 months. |
Program expansion to begin in 08-09 school
year. |
Question on parent survey. |
Goal II: Teachers and Principals Will Deliver High Quality
Instruction to Every Student
Goal II: Teachers and Principals Will Deliver High
Quality Instruction to Every Student
Strategy 1: Develop a talent pipeline for teachers,
teacher leaders, and principals (Expands initiative articulated in Master
Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Front end recruitment of high quality teachers and
principals:
-
Through a targeted marketing campaign,
aggressively recruit principals in the metro region and other
states who have demonstrated high student performance and high
growth.
-
Expand recruitment of DC Teaching Fellows by
using mentor relationships during college with Teaching Fellow
alumni and a designated Teaching Fellow signing bonus.
-
Expand DCPS participation in the Teach For
America program.
-
More aggressively recruit teachers in
critical-areas of math and special education, through a
targeted marketing campaign, additional compensation and
partnering with colleges and the private sector.
|
Work to begin immediately; ongoing. |
See SchoolStat below |
| Develop career ladder for teachers –
into teacher leadership roles (mentor, master, coach) and into the
principalship. |
100 days. |
Comprehensive overview of current
career ladder opportunities (teacher leadership positions,
leadership training, etc.); timeline for addressing identified
needs. |
| Develop SchoolStat measures for human
resources department. Create a bonus program for HR to reward its
efforts for opening the school year with no vacancies and/or
meeting recruiting and staffing targets. |
60 days |
SchoolStat data dashboard with HR
specific indicators, including percent of teaching positions
filled by the first day of school and throughout the school year. |
Strategy 2: Improve teacher working conditions. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Establish an independently administered school survey to collect teacher information on
working conditions. Require that concerns raised in survey be addressed in school
improvement plans. Data will be disaggregated by school, maintaining the confidentiality of
individuals. |
Develop RFP within 60 days. Identify vendor within 90 days. (Possible
project for research consortium; see below), Complete survey administration within 6
months. |
Survey developed, administered, and analyzed in accordance with time line.
Data will serve as SchoolStat measure for principals. |
Strategy 3: Refine professional development for improved instruction (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Conduct an audit of DCPS professional development programs to catalogue range of
programs, assess quality, and prioritize based on strategic goals. |
120 days. |
Report assessing strength of professional development program and making
recommendations for improvements. |
| Institute school-based professional development models on a pilot basis, focusing
on building the capacity of teachers to collaborate, analyze data and adapt practice
accordingly, and for principals to implement and lead school wide reform strategies. |
Expand CIT/NLNS/TFA partnership to 2-3 more schools in 07-08. Identify schools within
30 days.
Investigate feasibility of introducing TAP in 1-2 schools for 07-08. |
Implementation plan. Assess and improve the capacity and
effectiveness of the Principal’s Leadership Institute. |
| Assess current implementation of New Teacher
Induction and Mentoring program and adjust as necessary to meet original goals of program. |
120 days. Institute aggressive mentor recruitment program to generate strong pool of
candidates. |
Fully staffed mentor program, in compliance
with grant requirements. |
Strategy 4: Recognize and reward high-performing staff with individual and school wide compensation initiatives.
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Implement the differentiated compensation pilot in the current WTU contract. |
Where possible, roll out models for 07-08; alternatively, establish planning year. |
Implementation plan. |
|
Explore additional salary and bonus initiatives for targeted schools, based on rigorous
standards of evaluation, including:
|
Analysis of options and discussions with WTU
to begin immediately. |
Summary of options and agreed upon implementation plan. |
Strategy 5: Ensure equitable staffing for every school. (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
|
Explore the creation of incentive programs aimed at increasing the number of
high-performing teachers at low-performing schools, such as signing and performance based
bonuses, and tuition reimbursement programs. |
Analysis to begin immediately. |
Summary of options analysis and agreed upon implementation plan. |
|
Adjust school-level budgeting process to allocate real dollars, rather than teaching
positions. Schools could then allocate any “extra” funds towards teacher professional
development or support. Current teachers would be grandfathered in, at
the principals’ discretion. |
Begin budget analysis immediately. |
Established for 09 budget. |
Goal III: Safe and Orderly Schools
Strategy 1: Ensure student discipline policies are enforced consistently throughout school district. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Revise the current student discipline policy to
include alternatives to out of school suspension.
Offer training to principals and teachers on the new policy.
Develop a handbook that will be distributed to principals, teachers, parents, and students to
ensure that all parties are aware of the new policy. |
Policy revision will begin immediately. |
The revised student discipline policy will be implemented at the beginning of the 2007-2008 school year. School performance
measures to be monitored via SchoolStat. |
Strategy 2: Reorganize and expand alternative education programs. (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| DCPS will develop more placement options
that will address student offenses through specific programs to meet student needs using
a tiered system. This will include student/parent selected placement at certain
schools; district selected placement at alternative programs for certain incidents;
district selected placement at other alternative programs for more egregious offenses; and, if
necessary, exclusion and expulsion. |
Conduct an assessment and evaluation of existing alternative education programs.
Assessment will begin within 100 days. |
Expand programs where gaps exist to serve more students. |
Strategy 3: Train teachers and principals on best ways to handle student behavior issues. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Collaborate with a community partner to
provide training to teachers and principals on strategies for handling bullying among
students. |
Search for community partner will begin
immediately.
Provide professional development training to teachers and principals that focuses on
strategies to handle bullying among students. Training will be ongoing. |
Professional development strategy incorporated into professional development
calendar. |
| Evaluate Positive Behavior Intervention and
Support (PBIS). PBIS, a process for creating safer and more effective schools, will be
evaluated. PBIS focuses on positive behavior for all students, all staff, and in all settings to
prevent problem behavior. School staff sets rules that are consistently taught and
reinforced by all school personnel. Data is collected on disciplinary infractions using a
Web-based system. PBIS is based on a long history of research-based behavioral practices. |
Evaluation of PBIS will begin at the conclusion of the 2006-2007 school year. |
If successful, PBIS will be expanded throughout the school system. |
Strategy 4: Strengthen relationships with community partners.
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Strengthen relationships with community
partners who are addressing youth violence and gang activity. DCPS will convene
meetings with various groups to discuss strategies and to put those strategies into
actions. |
Immediately begin meeting with community
partners that have experience handling youth violence and gang activity.
Develop an action plan within 100 days. Strategies will be implemented during the
2007-2008 school year. |
Action plan will be implemented system wide and will be communicated to principals and
teachers. |
Strategy 5: Continue/expand the work of the Truancy Taskforce (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Expand work of the taskforce to include focus
on dropout prevention and re-entry strategies. |
Truancy Task Force will begin expansion work
during the 2007-2008 school year. |
Dropout rate will be reduced and more students will return to the school system. |
Goal IV: Develop a Strong System of Accountability Balanced
with School Level Autonomy
Strategy 1: Develop a district-wide SchoolStat accountability system. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Identify first set of tracking measures around
special education, human resources, and school climate. |
60 days |
Data dashboards for key functions developed |
| Orient all employees to concept, philosophy,
and process of SchoolStat |
60 days |
|
| Bring all managers through a process of
identifying their top level tracking measures |
180 days |
Department level dashboards developed for
every function. |
Strategy 2: Establish data infrastructure and research partnerships that allow effective analysis. (Expands initiative articulated in Master
Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Implement state-wide data system with unique
student and teacher identifiers. |
Immediately and ongoing. 95% accuracy of student identifier system by
the end of the 2007-2008 school year. |
“Bad data reports” feed into a SchoolStat measure for principals. |
| Initiate “Schools Research Consortium” that
would provide capacity to inform policy decisions. |
90 days |
Established independent entity. |
| Partner with researcher to kick-off value added
study of teacher effectiveness |
Identify researcher and research question
within 60 days. First round of analysis within 9 months. |
Ongoing analysis of teacher value-added by
source of teachers, professional development programs. |
Strategy 3: Shift resources and decision-making to the schools, and away from the central administration. (Expands initiative
articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Develop a transparent and phased-in program
for earned autonomy aimed at shifting the district philosophically, so that resources and
decision-making are closer to the classroom than to a centralized office, as is now the case.
The central office will set broad goals and standards of consistency and accountability. It
will maintain control of defining outcomes and other areas that require standardization, as well
as services that benefit from economies of scale.
The learning communities will be responsible for areas that require flexibility and
adjustment, such as some parts of staff development and some parts of instruction.
This reorganization will help realize a managed performance/empowerment system.
Certain central office academic positions will be redeployed to schools. The central-office
administration will be fully reorganized as the FY09 budget is developed. |
Establish baseline within first 100 days.
Identify currently operating models of autonomy in DCPS and clear opportunities
(e.g., innovation pilot schools). |
Timeline and targets for phased in implementation for first 24 months. |
Goal V: Ensure World-Class Service
Strategy 1: Conduct a comprehensive service audit and service improvement program. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Conduct an audit, including the use of “secret
shoppers,” to determine baseline standards for responsiveness and service. The audit will
measure current levels of effectiveness in several key areas, including how parents and
other visitors are treated, how inquiries are handled (written correspondence, fax, email,
interpersonal), the physical environment, external environment, signage and visual
communications. |
Audit will begin within 100 days. The results of the audit will lead to the creation
of a service improvement program. |
Solutions for improving satisfaction levels among various publics will be developed, and
will address such issues as organizational culture, goals, employee incentives, service
processes, communications, and service measures. |
| Develop a comprehensive approach to service
improvement, including management modeling, incentive programs, organizational
structures, service processes, employee recognition/reward systems, employee
training, and internal/external communication plans that are all focused on better serving
DCPS. |
|
|
Strategy 2: Develop service standards. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| DCPS will establish measurable service standards for each department, school and
facility, develop a monitoring system and include annual results in all employees’
performance appraisals. |
Standards development will begin within 100
days. |
Implement standards system wide. |
Strategy 3: Provide service training and communication on customer service initiatives. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| DCPS will provide ongoing employee training
and communication on customer service initiatives and on techniques to improve
quality and process. |
Training will be ongoing. |
Customer service training will be offered to all DCPS employees, including principals,
teachers, and administrative staff. Service training will be aligned with newly
implemented service standards. |
Strategy 4: Strengthen employee communications. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| A comprehensive internal communications
program will be developed. It will use a variety of tools and methods, including
Connect-Ed, email, DCPS Intranet, DCPSTV99, meetings, special events and other
communication channels. |
Work on the internal communications program
will begin during the 2006-2007 school year. |
DCPS employees will be informed about DCPS news and information on a timely basis. |
| DCPS will start an employee feedback system
to monitor satisfaction levels and to identify key issues and concerns. We will develop
print and online versions and will poll employees annually to determine the success
of communications and job satisfaction. |
Annual survey will be distributed to teachers at
the conclusion of the 2006-2007 school year. |
Survey results will be analyzed and reported
annually to the Chancellor and executive staff. Changes will be made within DCPS to areas of
concern. |
Strategy 5: Assess business operations. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
Evaluate all key business operations to
determine their effectiveness and efficiency, how they can be improved, and whether better
performance can be achieved through outsourcing. The business operations to be
evaluated include human resources,
procurement, transportation, food service, inventory management, warehousing and
distribution, and graphic production. |
Teams will be convened to evaluate key business operations within 100 days.
These teams will compare best practices and benchmarks to actual in-house performance and
develop improvement plans for each operation. |
Implementation of the improvement plans will begin during the 2007-2008 school year.
Business operations will be evaluated on an ongoing basis. Improved service outcomes on SchoolStat
measures identified during audit. |
Goal VI: Build on Our Community's Assets
Strategy 1: Develop ombudsman program. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Partner with the Executive Office of the Mayor
to implement the proposed ombudsman program. |
Communication regarding the existence of the
Office of the Ombudsman will begin within 100 days. |
The Office of the Ombudsman will help bridge the gap between DCPS central administration
and parents/community members and resolve individual concerns and issues more quickly
and efficiently. |
Strategy 2: Redesign and restructure Web site. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Redesign and restructure the DCPS Web site to
increase user-friendliness and to develop sections designed specifically for current
DCPS parents, prospective parents, students, employees, community partners and
volunteers, news representatives, vendors and other key audiences. |
Design of new website will begin within 100
days. |
Website will become more user-friendly and will include information on individual schools. |
Strategy 3: Improve communication and collaboration with parents and stakeholders. (Expands initiative articulated in Master
Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Develop new district-wide DCPS parent packets, which will include parent handbooks
and other useful information, and distribute these to new families, real estate agents,
pediatricians' offices, child-care centers, pre-kindergarten sites, houses of worship and other
community gathering places. |
Development of parent packets will begin
within 100 days. |
Parents will be informed of the programs, services, and support DCPS has to offer. |
Strategy 4: Expand public engagement. (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Seek input from a variety of stakeholders on a
regular basis and strengthen communications with employees, parents, elected officials, nonprofit
leaders, real-estate agents, cultural institution leaders, the faith community and
others. |
A Working Group will be established within
100 days charged with recommending strategies to improve communication between
DCPS and community stakeholders. Public engagement will be ongoing. |
Increased collaboration between DCPS and other stakeholders.
Regularly scheduled parent and community forums, summits, focus groups, advisory
committees, opinion polls, and other techniques to garner public input into DCPS
decision-making processes and initiatives. |
| DCPS will start a feedback system for parents,
students, and other key stakeholders. Annual, statistically valid public opinion polls of key
stakeholders will gauge satisfaction with DCPS services and responsiveness.
Distribute “How are we doing?” service feedback cards to all schools and departments,
monitor results and report annually to the Chancellor. |
|
Increased responsiveness to parent, student,
and community concerns. Acknowledgement of concerns/complaints within 24 hours. Solutions offered within 30
days. |
Strategy 5: Strengthen community partnerships and volunteers. (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Strengthen, develop and focus community
partnerships that promote student academic success, student mentoring and a safe
environment. Conduct an analysis to map and determine the effectiveness of current
programs and make recommendations for improvement.
Hold summit meetings with faith leaders and expand partnerships with area houses of
worship to provide additional support for DCPS students, especially those considered at
risk of failure in school. |
|
Expand efforts of the office of strategic partnerships to better organize and engage
parents and volunteers from area businesses and the community.
Increased volunteerism in DCPS schools. |
Strategy 6: Increase Principal Accountability for Parent and Community Outreach (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Include effective proactive parent &
community outreach as part of principal accountability framework. |
Principals will receive training on ways to
provide effective outreach to parents and community members. The principal evaluation
instrument will be amended to include measurements for parent and community
outreach beginning in the 2008-2009 school year. |
SchoolStat Measures.
Amended evaluation instrument. |
Strategy 7: Host regular media briefings. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| The Chancellor’s office will hold regular
media briefings to keep reporters and the public abreast of important DCPS news and
information. |
Regular briefings will begin within 100 days. |
Increased level of transparency between the
public and DCPS.
Regular media briefing schedule released. |
Strategy 8: Partner with EOM’s Office of Parent & Community Involvement to launch Parent Academy. (New initiative)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Provide ongoing training, information and
support via district-wide Parent Academy courses. These courses will be developed in
partnership with local businesses, organizations and educational institutions and
offered at no charge at area schools, libraries, businesses, houses of worship, non-profit
organizations and government offices. Possible topics are GED classes and computer
competency, family literacy and mathematics. |
The implementation of Parent Academies will
begin in the 2007-2008 school year. |
Parental involvement in the education process
will be increased, which has been shown to have a direct and positive impact on student
achievement. |
Strategy 9: Strengthen Local School Restructuring Teams (LSRTs). (Expands initiative articulated in Master Education Plan)
| Activity |
Timeframe (subject to effective
date of Council action) |
Outcome/Measurement |
| Increase consistent and strong actions by
LSRTs to focus on school improvement planning and student performance. |
Training for administrators and parent leaders
will be provided beginning in the 2007-2008 school year. |
Stronger School Improvement Plans &
Budgets. |
DCPS Goals 2010/111
Following are the high level Measures of Success to which we will hold ourselves accountable. The Chancellor would propose
targets for each measure.
Student Achievement Outcomes
- Percentage of students performing at or above proficiency in reading in grades three through eight (BASELINE: 35% at or
above proficiency in reading in 2006. (DC CAS)).
- Percentage of students performing at or above proficiency in mathematics in grades three through eight (BASELINE: 26% at
or above proficiency in mathematics in 2006. (DC CAS)).
- Percentage of students performing at or above proficiency on writing assessment in grades four and eight. (BASELINE: 11%
of DCPS 4th graders at or above proficiency in writing; the NAEP national average was 27%. 10% of DCPS 8th graders at or
above proficiency in writing; NAEP national average of 30%. (NCES, 2002 Trial Urban District Assessment))
- Narrowing of disparity based on race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status on all academic measures.
BASELINE:
Reading: 91% of white students tested at or above proficiency in reading, more than 3 times the rate of black students (29%)
and 2.25 times the rate of Hispanic students (40%). (2006 DC CAS)
Mathematics: 80% of white students tested at or above proficiency in mathematics, 4 times the rate of black students (20%)
and 2.6 times the rate of Hispanic students (31%).
- Percentage of students graduating within 5 years (BASELINE: 43% of entering 9th graders graduate within 5 years. (October
2006 DTN)) (Baseline data on this measure are not particularly reliable.)
- Percentage of Advanced Placement exams receiving a score of 3 or higher (BASELINE: DCPS 28%; national average 58%.
(College Board, 2006))
- Increase in average score on the SAT, accompanied by increase in percentage of students who take the test will also increase.
(BASELINE: 1204 out of 2400. (2006)
- Percentage of students will meet or exceed the national average on the National Assessment for Educational Progress
(NAEP) in reading, mathematics and science.
- Student performance data will be communicated to parents and students on a regular basis and in a consistent manner.
Instructional Staff
- Percentage of effective teaching staff. Effectiveness will be measured by fair and rigorous evaluations, including objective
student outcome measures and research-based assessment of instructional practice. Target will be set after a district-wide
teacher accountability system has been proposed, evaluated, and adopted.
- Percentage of teaching positions filled on first day of school, and at intervals throughout the year.
- Percentage of key instructional support positions filled at predetermined points during the year. This includes, but is not
limited to, math and literacy coaches, and new teacher mentors.
Conditions for Effective Teaching and Learning
- Percentage of “certified” classrooms. Standards will be defined for the “certification” of classroom readiness (necessary
instructional materials and supplies). Data to be reported in such a way as to reveal any systematic differences between groups
of schools (grade level, poverty level, performance level, etc.)
- Percentage of schools meeting DCPS standards for technology (Baseline standards to be determined.).
- Percentage of schools meeting standards for co-curricular activities. Minimum standards will be developed for co-curricular
activities at all levels. (Co-curricular activities are extensions of the core curriculum and provide an opportunity for students to
use critical thinking skills learned in the classroom outside of the traditional classroom setting. Examples include chess, Math
Olympiad, National Academic League, Debate, Science Olympiad, Odyssey of the Mind, and Model UN.) Once minimum
standards are set, the baseline percentage of all schools meeting the DCPS standard of co-curricular activities will be set and
tracked moving forward.
- Percentage of schools receiving the top rating(s) on the DCPS SchoolStat Accountability System; (see Appendix 1).
Safe and Orderly Schools
- Percentage of students indicating they feel safe at school. (Survey and baseline data to be completed by end of first year of
mayoral control.)
- Percentage of parents indicating they believe schools are safe. (Survey and baseline data to be completed by end of first year
of mayoral control.)
- Percentage of schools scoring at or above 90 percent on an annual safe school audit. (Audit and baseline data to be completed
by end of first year of mayoral control.)
- Change in the number of state-reportable incidents of inappropriate behavior per 1,000 students.
World Class Service
- Percentage of employees, parents and community members who agree DCPS provides timely, accurate and responsive service
on annual satisfaction surveys and polls.
Strong Parent and Community Connections
- Percentage of DCPS parents agreeing that DCPS is doing a good job and is headed in the right direction.
- Percentage of community members agreeing that DCPS is doing a good job and is headed in the right direction.
APPENDIX 1: DCPS SchoolStat Accountability System
Overview
In order to exercise consistent oversight and ensure that the academic and positive youth development goals of DCPS are attainable by
every DCPS student, the Chancellor (in partnership with the Executive Office of the Mayor & the Office of the City Administrator)
will institute and maintain a district wide school accountability system known as SchoolStat. SchoolStat will be rigorous, fair,
difficult to manipulate, easy to understand and describe, and designed with the purpose of holding all schools and their staffs
accountable for meeting academic and positive youth development goals and success in meeting other operational performance goals.
The SchoolStat Summary Performance Measure shall be concise and simple so that it may be easily understood by the general public.
(SchoolStat will also be used to track short-term tactical performance measures at the school and department level that may not be
factored into the SchoolStat Summary Performance Measure.) The Chancellor, working with the Executive Office of the Mayor & the
Office of the City Administrator, will establish SchoolStat standards, and schools and their staffs will be rated on how well they meet
those standards, as indicated by their performance on a variety of measures.
The Chancellor will be charged with developing and implementing an accountability system consisting of three key components,
described in further detail below:
- School performance classification system
- Program of rewards and sanctions
- Communications plan
1. School Performance Classification System
The school performance classification system shall be a reliable measure of how students at each DCPS school perform against
appropriate benchmark academic standards and how each school meets other performance and operational goals. The
classification system must also measure each school’s progress towards meeting all standards. The ratings within the
classification system will be based on a combination of numerous criteria.
2. Rewards and Sanctions
Schools and staffs that achieve high levels in the classification system shall be recognized and rewarded. Rewards may
include teacher and staff bonuses, pay-for-performance, salary differentiation, increased site-level freedom, and flexibility in
certain aspects of the instructional program and school operations. Schools, principals, and teachers that do not achieve a
rating deemed to be acceptable shall be sanctioned in a variety of ways, which may include loss of site-level freedom and
flexibility in their job duties that may have been earned previously. There must also be a process to provide guidance and
assistance to schools that do not achieve an acceptable rating, including directions for developing and implementing plans for
addressing the areas for which the ratings are not acceptable.
3. Communications Plan
An effective communications plan shall inform and educate employees, students, parents, and the community about the
accountability system and provide assurance to the Executive Office of the Mayor that the school performance classification
system criteria are widely disseminated throughout the district and the community.
Timeline for Development
The Executive Office of the Mayor intends for the SchoolStat Accountability System to be fully operational for the 2008-2009 school
year. For the first year following the enactment of the District of Columbia Public Education Reform Amendment Act of 2007, the
Chancellor will report to the Executive Office of the Mayor on a quarterly basis regarding the progress in developing the school
performance classification system and in accomplishing the other tasks necessary for the successful implementation of the SchoolStat
Accountability System. Upon completion, the Chancellor shall present the finalized school performance classification system to the
Executive Office of the Mayor.
Timeline for EOM Oversight
The SchoolStat Accountability System shall be piloted during the 2007-2008 school year. At the end of that school year, the
Chancellor shall report to the EOM regarding each school’s performance according to the classification system. No rewards or
sanctions shall be imposed. Beginning with data from the 2008-2009 school year and on an annual basis thereafter, the Chancellor
shall report to the EOM regarding each school’s performance according to the classification system, the awarding of any rewards or
imposition of sanctions, and the status of district and school plans for addressing the areas for which the ratings are not acceptable.
After the SchoolStat Accountability System has been operational for two full school years, the Chancellor will provide the EOM with
an evaluation of whether or not the accountability system is contributing to increased levels of student achievement throughout
DCPS. In any event, after the EOM has been presented with no more than five years of school performance reports, the EOM will
evaluate the effectiveness of the system and whether it should be continued in its current format or modified. If the EOM decides to
continue the accountability system, in its current or modified format, it will also establish a timeline for further evaluations of the
program’s effectiveness.
SchoolStat Data Dashboard
In order to help DCPS attain and maintain excellence in all key areas, the EOM with support from the Office of the City Administrator
and in consultation with the Chancellor, will establish a SchoolStat “data dashboard” that is aligned with the EOM’s management
oversight responsibilities and the SchoolStat Accountability System. The data dashboard will consist of a limited number of
indicators selected by the EOM (analogous to the dials on a car dashboard) for which data are gathered and analyzed by DCPS staff,
under the direction of the Chancellor, and presented on a regular basis to the EOM and the public.
Although the EOM will track DCPS’ performance in many ways throughout the year, the data dashboard will enable the EOM and the
public to monitor key indicators of system performance, including but not limited to student achievement, finance, operations, and
parent, student, and teacher satisfaction. The indicators will enable the EOM and public to see, at a glance, whether current
improvement efforts are on track and to respond appropriately when problems arise. The indicators will enable DCPS to effectively
and clearly communicate its priorities and progress to the public.
The data dashboard will do the following:
- Provide a concise, but comprehensive summary of district performance, including baseline data, targets and results,
- Present data clearly and in an easily understood manner,
- Communicate the EOM’s priorities to the community, and
- Contain regularly updated information based on regular management reports and management oversight workshops.
The data dashboard will be reviewed and updated at least annually. The Chancellor will ensure that the data dashboard is widely
disseminated throughout the school district and the District of Columbia community.
1 DCPS Goals 2010/11 go through the end of the second full fiscal year that the schools are under Mayoral control. If the necessary legislation
transferring control to the Mayor is approved by Congress prior to the start of FY2008 (October 1, 2007) then the goals here will go through the end of FY2009
(which ends September 30, 2010). If the necessary legislation is approved after the start of FY2008, then these goals will go through the end of FY2010 (which ends September 30, 2011). |